In a blog post, Ryan Stewart commented on my interview with Dr. Dobb's journal. Ryan quoted my comment on enterprises endorsing Web 2.0 via RIA, as a valuable one. When you read Ryan's post, please read the first comment. Someone suggested if that was "pay for interview". I refuted it since we were approached by the editorial board at Dr. Dobb's Journal for the interview rather than vice versa.
Ryan further commented: Jnan said below that it wasn't a pay deal, but I think it shows how little people know about RIAs in a lot of circles. I think part of the reason that it came off as a section of the about page on Curl was that Dr. Dobbs readers have no idea about RIAs or Curl. It's the price we pay to get information out.
Ryan has a valid point. The awareness on RIA is quite low. The Web 2.0 noise does not include RIA as a key component. They speak of tagging, mash-ups, wikis, bolgs, social software, etc. No CIO has a clue regarding the business value of any of these cool technologies. Believe me, I have friends in several companies pushing these technologies and when it comes to use in the large coprorations, they do not know how. RIA is the low-hanging fruit because it immensley improves the user experience.
Imagine a large corporation having 30,000 PC's dispersed all over the country at field locations. The application is an old client-server one serving the field engineers. Then comes the upgrade to Vista and associated upgrades to the applcation supporting Vista and other features. Just the cost of doing that will blow your mind. Now replace that scene with a SaaS delivery of the same application over the Web. This application uses the Web as a client platform delivering better UI. The TCO is lower while the user experience is superior. I just narrated many such user experiences of Curl customers in Asia. That's why RIA customers in Japan are ahead of the US corporate awareness.
It's time, the corporate community wakes up to the RIA advantage.